🔗 Share this article

Mounting apprehensions are present about the chance of military engagement involving East African countries, the Ethiopian government and the Eritrean government, as confrontational rhetoric has ratcheted up in the past few weeks.

What Did Ethiopian Officials Stated?

Ethiopia's, being landlocked, calls for entry to the maritime outlet through Eritrean territory has sparked a heated verbal exchange.

PM Abiy Ahmed first openly declared in last year that his country's sea access was an crucial concern, comments that Eritrea ignored.

Diplomatic connections between the neighboring nations have frequently been strained. After a prolonged fight for sovereignty, the Eritrean state, which has a long maritime frontage, officially seceded from Ethiopian rule in the early 1990s, leaving it cut off from the sea.

Five years later, a military clash erupted in which numerous people died.

Recent Comments from Ethiopia's Leadership

Abiy and army chief Field Marshal Birhanu Jula have publicly asserted sovereignty of Eritrean maritime facility of the port of Assab – about 60km from the frontier - and suggested the desire to capture it through military means.

On 1 September, Abiy said Ethiopia's "mistake" of losing entry to the Red Sea as a due to Eritrea's separation would be "addressed in the future".

Ethiopia's ambassador to neighboring Kenya, ex-military officer Bacha, said that the port was "belonging to Ethiopia" and would be given back "by force".

Eritrea's Answer to the Claims

In the face of ongoing threats from Ethiopia, Eritrea's reaction has been confined to short statements on online platforms from Communications Head Yemane Gebremeskel.

The minister has dismissed Ethiopian requests for sea access calling it "dangerous" and a "harmful plan" of "irredentism" – a strategy of claiming back former lands.

Government spokespeople alerted on mid-September that attempts to validate "blatant hostility" would have significant repercussions for Ethiopia and its regional partners and is a "redline that should not be crossed|violated|breached".

Military Preparations on the Ground

Currently, there are few indications of large-scale army activities in the boundary zones between the two countries.

Nonetheless, in the country, government media has shown completion events of numerous trainees at multiple army bases.

The director of staff section of the armed forces, the officer, commented lately in an interview that the defense forces was in a "reliable position" as "many thousands of young people" were entering service, which he said was "a signal to our enemies".

Previous Roots of the Tension

For decades from the late 19th century, the territory was governed by Italian rulers.

After World War II, it was then administered by the British military before turning into a integrated region of the Ethiopian empire.

Yet in 1962 Emperor Haile Selassie I ended this system and the region became totally absorbed into the Ethiopian state.

A thirty-year civil war followed, concluding with Ethiopia's defeat in 1991. Autonomy was then confirmed by the population in a plebiscite in 1993.

Temporarily in the 1990s, there were good relations between the authorities in Ethiopia's capital and Asmara, but they fell out over the exact location of their common border, causing conflict in 1998.

Even though this concluded in a peace deal in 2000, it was never fully implemented, and the two nations continued at in dispute.

This changed in 2018, when Abiy made gestures to Eritrean President Isaias Afwerki. The two agreed to a announcement that the war was over – a action that earned the Prime Minister the international recognition.

The neighboring states were then allies in Ethiopia's 2020-2022 armed struggle in Tigray.

But relations have since broken down once more.