🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.